Ghost Report Claims Fall in Youth Militancy in Kashmir Since Abrogation of Article 370.
On the eve
of 9th February while helping a friend write short blog blurbs for
an internship that she was doing, I came across a news story titled, ‘Number of
Youths Joining Militancy in Kashmir Has Decreased: A Report’, that immediately
caught my eye. Given the current climate in the country with Anti-CAA protests
and many questioning the secular nature of our nation, the Kashmir issue
continues to nag me at the back of mind; especially after the abrogation of Article
370 and consequent Internet blackout in the region. At a time when the region
has been shut out from the rest of the country, news going in and out must be
closely regulated to ensure that there isn’t spread of misinformation.
I skimmed
through the report, not giving it much importance until I reached the end of it
and realized that the article pointed out specific details of an unnamed
‘report’ by ‘security agencies’ without giving any hint as to where the story
came from. The ‘report’ is allegedly a comparative study of military
development before and after the abrogation of Article 370 and says that youth
recruitments have gone down from fourteen a month to five a month after August
last year. The article goes on to state that the number of deaths due to law
and order incidents have gone down and that episodes of stone-pelting have also
decreased. It supposedly points out that the large crowds that would earlier
gather at the funeral of militants, where other youths were also recruited, have
become a rare occurrence. The report mentions that the youth was encouraged to
pick up arms and join militant organizations because of the last calls that
trapped terrorists made to their families in distress. These call recordings
would somehow make their way to the masses, hearing which the youth would get
misled into picking up arms, the report states.
These calls
have also allegedly decreased, partly because communication channels have been
restricted in Kashmir since August last year. The report claims that an explanation for these changes is that ‘the scenario in Kashmir has changed
since last year’.
Given the current climate of unrest in the nation, a report suggesting such developments
should’ve been front-page news, however, my search only found that several other online news
publications had published the exact same article with different headlines.
Most of these publications are only subsets of national dailies and no such
report was published in any newspaper. The next day, when I searched the web
again, I found that several more news blogs and publishers had posted the same
article. All these websites and blogs named PTI as the source of this story. In
two days, this story was trending on the webpages of major news sites, without
naming any source or giving any attribution whatsoever.
On 11th
of February, I tracked down the first website to publish this article which was
the website of a local magazine of the
region called ‘The Kashmir Monitor’; the piece was originally published on the
5th of February by what was tagged as PTI. This same article was
then republished by several news blogs on the 9th of February, after
which it was picked up several other major news publications.
Surely, a report
of this magnitude would’ve found some mention in a press release on websites of
government agencies. I looked for anything related to that article on the
websites of the Press Information Bureau, the Ministry of Home Affairs as well
the Government of Jammu and Kashmir, but the results came up empty.
As a student
of journalism and media, we are taught that providing a source to the story is
not imperative to add value to the story but also to legitimise it against the
easily available rhetoric. Just like an
argument in a courtroom, news must be backed by hard evidence to be accepted as
a legitimate piece of news. However, the concept is not as familiar to the
regular public and they usually believe the news published by their trusted
publications and news dailies.
A book I’ve
been reading by Ryan Howard, outlines how news is traded up the chain from news
blogs to bigger publications and even bigger publications without the news
being checked for legitimacy; such news may not make it to the papers, but it
causes enough damage by existing online.
The year
2019 was called ‘The Year Of Fake News’ by the Economic Times, and the year
2020 seems to be following in its footsteps. Unverified news articles making
tall claims, especially on the web and broadcast news channels have become a
regular feature in India. The one odd article may seem harmless but the reach
of online news is extremely large and now online news has the ability to drive
people’s opinions. News stories of this kind play their part in causing unrest
by misguiding people and spreading misinformation in the country.
It is almost
a month later, and even now this news remains unverified on the web playing
it’s part of being a civil menace.
Comments
Post a Comment